Physics · Waves & the Particle Nature of Light · AS Level

Superposition & Standing Waves

Pluck a guitar string and it doesn't just wobble randomly — it settles into one of a small number of very specific shapes, each with its own fixed pattern of still points and points of maximum motion. That pattern is a standing wave, and it's built entirely from two ordinary progressive waves meeting and adding together.

10 min read

The principle of superposition

When two or more waves meet at a point, the principle of superposition states that the resultant displacement is the vector sum of the individual displacements each wave would have produced on its own. Where two crests coincide, the displacements add to give a bigger crest; where a crest meets an equal trough, the displacements cancel; anything in between adds algebraically.

This applies no matter how complicated the individual waves are or how many are meeting at once. Once the waves have passed through each other, each continues exactly as if the other had never been there — superposition describes what happens while they overlap, not a permanent change to either wave.

The resultant depends on the phase difference between the two waves. When two waves of equal amplitude are exactly in phase (phase difference $0$, or a whole number of $360°$/$2\pi$ rad), they reinforce at every instant and the resultant amplitude doubles — constructive superposition. When exactly in antiphase (phase difference $180°$/$\pi$ rad), they cancel completely — destructive superposition. Any phase difference in between gives a resultant somewhere between these extremes.

Two stacked panels on a cream background, each showing three horizontal wave traces one above another sharing the same horizontal time axis. Top panel, captioned constructive superposition (in phase): the first trace is a sine wave labelled wave 1, the second trace directly below is an identical sine wave in the same position labelled wave 2, both crests and troughs lining up exactly with dashed vertical guide lines connecting matching peaks between the two traces. The third trace, separated by a thin horizontal divider and labelled resultant, is a sine wave with double the amplitude of the two above it, same wavelength, crests aligned with the same dashed guide lines. Bottom panel, captioned destructive superposition (antiphase): the first trace is a sine wave labelled wave 1, the second trace directly below is the same sine wave shifted horizontally by half a wavelength labelled wave 2, so that its troughs align under wave 1's crests, shown with dashed vertical guide lines connecting a crest on wave 1 to a trough on wave 2 at the same horizontal position. The third trace, labelled resultant, is a flat horizontal line at zero displacement, captioned zero displacement at every instant. All traces drawn as simple thin black sine curves on the cream background, with a faint horizontal zero-line through each trace, no colour.
Superposition of two equal-amplitude waves: exactly in phase, their displacements add to double the amplitude (top); exactly in antiphase — a phase difference of 180° or π rad — their displacements cancel completely (bottom).

How a stationary wave forms

A stationary (or standing) wave is produced by superposing two progressive waves of the same frequency (and wavelength), travelling through the same region in opposite directions, usually with similar amplitude.

The classic way to produce this on a string is to send a wave down toward a fixed end, which reflects it back with essentially the same frequency and wavelength. Now two waves of equal frequency, travelling in opposite directions, occupy the same string at once, and superposition takes over.

At certain fixed points, the two waves are always in antiphase — a crest of one always arrives when a trough of the other does — so by superposition, the displacement there is always zero. These points are called nodes. Midway between adjacent nodes, the two waves are always in phase, so their displacements reinforce: these antinodes oscillate with maximum amplitude. Everywhere else oscillates somewhere between zero and the maximum.

Adjacent nodes (or adjacent antinodes) are always exactly $\dfrac{\lambda}{2}$ apart.

The result is a pattern that doesn't travel along the string — unlike a progressive wave, no energy is transported from end to end; the pattern oscillates in place. A progressive wave transfers energy from source to destination, while a stationary wave stores it, oscillating locally between fixed nodes.

Three separate horizontal diagrams stacked vertically, each showing a string fixed at both ends (marked with small solid anchor symbols at each end) vibrating in a different standing-wave pattern, with a faint dashed outline showing the string at maximum upward and downward displacement simultaneously to indicate the full oscillation envelope. The top diagram shows the simplest pattern: a single symmetric loop bulging between the two fixed ends, with a node labelled at each fixed end and one antinode labelled at the centre peak, captioned first harmonic. The middle diagram shows two full loops side by side, alternating up and down, with three nodes labelled (one at each end, one exactly in the middle) and two antinodes labelled at the centre of each loop, captioned second harmonic. The bottom diagram shows three loops, with four nodes labelled (two ends plus two evenly spaced interior points) and three antinodes labelled at the centre of each loop, captioned third harmonic.
A string fixed at both ends supports a family of standing-wave patterns, each with its nodes and antinodes evenly spaced — the first, second and third harmonics shown here.
Terminology: harmonics, not "fundamental"

AQA's specification uses only the term harmonics — first harmonic, second harmonic, and so on — not "fundamental frequency" or "overtone." Some other boards use "fundamental" as another name for the first harmonic, but stick to "harmonics" language in AQA answers.

Deriving the first-harmonic frequency

The first harmonic is the simplest standing-wave pattern a stretched string can support: a single loop, with a node at each fixed end and one antinode at the centre — and therefore the lowest possible frequency the string can sustain. The formula for that frequency comes from combining two physical facts.

DerivationFirst-harmonic frequency of a stretched string
1
The speed of a transverse wave travelling along a stretched string depends on the tension $T$ in the string and the mass per unit length $\mu$ of the string, according to $c = \sqrt{\dfrac{T}{\mu}}$.
A tauter string, or a lighter string, carries waves faster — this result comes from applying Newton's second law to a small element of the string, though the full derivation isn't needed here.
2
For the first harmonic on a string of length $l$, fixed at both ends, exactly one node-to-node loop fits along the whole string, and one full loop corresponds to half a wavelength.
Looking at the first-harmonic pattern: nodes only occur at the two fixed ends, with a single antinode between them — that's half of one complete wave cycle.
3
So the wavelength of the first harmonic is related to the string length by $l = \dfrac{\lambda}{2}$, which rearranges to $\lambda = 2l$.
4
Substitute this into the wave equation $c = f\lambda$, rearranged for frequency: $f = \dfrac{c}{\lambda} = \dfrac{c}{2l}$.
5
Finally, substitute the wave-speed expression from step 1 in place of $c$: $f = \dfrac{1}{2l}\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{\mu}}$.
This is the first-harmonic frequency, built entirely from how fast a wave can travel on the string and how many wavelengths fit into its fixed length.
▪ derived

This formula shows directly why tightening a guitar string raises its pitch (larger $T$, larger $f$), why thicker strings sound lower for the same tension (larger $\mu$, smaller $f$), and why pressing a string shorter raises its pitch (smaller $l$, larger $f$) — all three levers a musician uses are exactly the three variables in this equation.

Worked exampleFirst-harmonic frequency of a guitar string
1
A guitar string of length $l = 0.65\ \text{m}$ and mass per unit length $\mu = 6.0\times10^{-4}\ \text{kg m}^{-1}$ is stretched to a tension of $T = 70\ \text{N}$. Find the frequency of the first harmonic.
2
Use $f = \dfrac{1}{2l}\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{\mu}}$, substituting the given values directly.
3
$\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{\mu}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{70}{6.0\times10^{-4}}} = \sqrt{116\,667} \approx 341.6\ \text{m s}^{-1}$.
This is the wave speed on the string — worth calculating as a separate step so a units or arithmetic slip is easy to spot.
4
$f = \dfrac{1}{2\times0.65}\times341.6 = \dfrac{341.6}{1.30} \approx 263\ \text{Hz}$.
Close to middle C (261.6 Hz), which is a reasonable pitch for a guitar's open string.
▪ answer

Required Practical: Stationary Waves on a String

AQA Required Practical

This is AQA's Required Practical 1 (sometimes called Melde's experiment).

Equipment

EquipmentPurpose
Vibration transducer + signal generatorDrives one end of the string at a precisely known, adjustable frequency
String or threadThe medium the stationary wave forms on
Pulley + clampRedirects the string over the bench edge so a mass can hang freely to set the tension
Mass hanger + slotted massesSets a known tension $T=mg$ in the string
Metre rulerMeasures the vibrating length $l$ of the string between nodes
Set squareHeld against the ruler to read the string's position without parallax error
Top-pan balanceWeighs a measured length of the string beforehand to find mass per unit length $\mu$

Method

MethodInvestigating f = (1/2l)√(T/μ)
1
Before setting up, cut a known length of the test string and weigh it on the top-pan balance; divide mass by length to find $\mu$, the mass per unit length.
2
Fix one end of the string to the vibration transducer. Run the string over the pulley at the other end and hang a mass from it to set a known tension $T=mg$.
3
Switch on the signal generator at a low frequency and slowly increase it, watching the string, until a clear stationary-wave pattern (a whole number of loops) forms with large, stable amplitude.
4
Measure the vibrating length $l$ between the two fixed ends (transducer and pulley) with the metre ruler, using the set square to read the position accurately. Count the number of loops $n$ to find the wavelength, $\lambda = 2l/n$.
5
Record the frequency $f$ shown on the signal generator display for this pattern.
6
To test each relationship in turn, change one variable at a time — the tension (by changing the hanging mass), the vibrating length, or the string itself (to change $\mu$) — re-tuning the frequency each time to find a new clear stationary-wave pattern, and repeat steps 4–5.
7
Take repeat readings at each setting and average, then compare against $f=\dfrac{1}{2l}\sqrt{T/\mu}$ — e.g. by plotting $f^2$ against $T$ (gradient $\dfrac{1}{4l^2\mu}$) to confirm the relationship linearly.
▪ method

Sources of error and how to minimise them

Parallax error reading the string's length

Reading the ruler from an angle makes the vibrating length appear shorter or longer than it really is. View the ruler at eye level, directly in line with the string, and use a set square held against the string to mark the exact node position.

Judging the frequency of clearest resonance

The pattern grows and shrinks smoothly around resonance rather than switching on sharply, making the "correct" frequency subjective. Sweep slowly past resonance and take the frequency where amplitude is largest and most stable.

Mass per unit length from a non-uniform string

A short offcut weighed on the balance may not represent the whole string if it isn't perfectly uniform. Weigh as long a sample as practical, and use the same reel/batch of string for the actual experiment.

Sagging string reducing the effective tension

Friction at the pulley, or a string not running truly horizontally, makes the tension slightly less than $mg$. Use a low-friction pulley, keep the string horizontal, and let the hanging mass settle before reading.

Key takeaways

  • The principle of superposition: where waves meet, the resultant displacement is the vector sum of the individual displacements.
  • Two equal-amplitude waves in phase (phase difference $0$) superpose constructively to double the amplitude; in antiphase (phase difference $180°$/$\pi$ rad) they superpose destructively to give zero displacement.
  • A stationary wave forms from two waves of the same frequency travelling in opposite directions through the same region, typically via reflection.
  • Nodes are fixed points of permanent zero displacement (the two waves are always in antiphase there); antinodes are fixed points of maximum oscillation amplitude (the two waves are always in phase there), midway between adjacent nodes — adjacent nodes are $\lambda/2$ apart, a phase difference of $180°$.
  • Unlike a progressive wave, a stationary wave transfers no net energy along its length — the pattern oscillates in place.
  • AQA uses only "harmonics" (first harmonic, second harmonic, …) — not "fundamental" or "overtone."
  • The first harmonic on a string of length $l$ has $\lambda = 2l$, giving $f = \dfrac{1}{2l}\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{\mu}}$, where $T$ is tension and $\mu$ is mass per unit length.
  • Required Practical 1 tests this formula by varying a string's length, tension and mass per unit length in turn and observing the resulting standing-wave frequency.