Proof by Deduction
The workhorse of A-Level proof: start from something known to be true, argue in careful algebraic steps, and arrive at the result — with no gaps.
What "proof by deduction" means
Deduction means reasoning forward from statements you already accept as true — definitions, given facts, or established results — through valid algebraic steps, until you reach the statement you were asked to prove. Every line must follow logically from the ones before it. If a marker can ask "why is that true?" at any step and you can't answer, the proof has a gap.
This is the most common form of proof at A-Level, and it's what's expected unless a question specifically asks for proof by exhaustion or disproof by counter-example.
1. A clear starting point — something known, or a sensible way to represent the objects (e.g. "let an even number be $2n$").
2. Connected steps — each line follows from the last by algebra or a stated fact.
3. A conclusion that matches the claim exactly — end by stating the thing you were asked to show, ideally with a closing line like "which is what we needed to prove."
Representing numbers algebraically
Most deductive proofs start by writing the objects in the claim in a general algebraic form. Get these right and half the work is done:
An even number is $2n$. An odd number is $2n+1$. Two consecutive integers are $n$ and $n+1$. A multiple of 3 is $3n$. The key idea: $n$ stands for any integer, so proving it for $2n$ proves it for every even number at once.
Worked example 1
The mark isn't just for reaching $2n+1$ — it's for the final sentence that connects it back to "odd." Students routinely lose the last mark by stopping at the algebra without concluding.
Worked example 2
Worked example 3
Completing the square is the standard deductive route for "always positive / always negative" proofs. The key insight is step 3 — spotting that a squared term can't be negative — which turns an algebraic expression into a watertight argument.
Testing a few numbers (like $3^2 - 2^2 = 5 = 3+2$) is not a proof — it only shows it works for those cases. A deductive proof must use a general $n$ so it holds for every integer. Checking examples is a good way to see what's going on, but never counts as the proof itself.
Check yourself
Prove that the sum of any three consecutive integers is a multiple of 3.