Natural Logarithms
One base gets a name of its own: $e$. Its logarithm, $\ln$, is the tool you'll reach for constantly — it undoes $e^x$ directly, and every exam question with $e$ in it expects you to know it cold.
What ln means
The natural logarithm, written $\ln$, is simply the logarithm base $e$:
Every rule you already know for logarithms applies to $\ln$ unchanged — it's the base $10$ of the previous lesson, swapped for base $e$. What makes it worth a lesson of its own is how often $e$ turns up: exponential models, compound growth, and (later) calculus all produce $e^x$ naturally, so $\ln$ becomes the standard way of "undoing" it.
ln and eˣ cancel each other
Because $\ln$ and $e^x$ are inverse functions, composing them in either order just returns what you started with:
These two identities are the main computational tool of this lesson. Whenever an $\ln$ sits directly outside a power of $e$ (or an $e$ sits directly outside an $\ln$), it cancels immediately — no calculator, no laws, just the definition of an inverse.
This is exactly the same idea as $\sqrt{x^2} = x$ or $(\sqrt{x})^2 = x$ — a function undoing its own inverse. The reason it matters so much here is practical: any equation with the unknown trapped inside a power of $e$ can be freed by taking $\ln$ of both sides, and any equation with the unknown trapped inside an $\ln$ can be freed by raising $e$ to both sides. That's the entire strategy behind solving equations involving $e$ — the next lesson builds on precisely this.
Special values and the domain of ln
Three values fall straight out of the definition, exactly as they did for a general base: $\ln e = 1$ (since $e^1 = e$), $\ln 1 = 0$ (since $e^0 = 1$), and $\ln\!\left(\dfrac1e\right) = -1$ (since $e^{-1} = \dfrac1e$).
Because $e^y$ is only ever positive whatever $y$ is, $\ln x$ is only defined for $x > 0$ — there is no real value of $\ln 0$ or $\ln(\text{negative number})$. Graphically, $y = \ln x$ passes through $(1, 0)$, climbs slowly and without bound as $x$ increases, and has a vertical asymptote at $x = 0$ — the mirror image of $y = e^x$'s horizontal asymptote at $y = 0$, reflected in the line $y = x$.
The laws of ln
Because $\ln$ is a logarithm like any other, the product, quotient and power laws carry straight across:
Nothing new to learn here beyond swapping the base — but combined with the cancellation identities above, $\ln$ becomes a genuinely powerful simplifying tool.
Worked example 1
These cancellations are instant once you spot the pattern — no laws, no calculator. The only way to get them wrong is overthinking: if you see $\ln$ wrapped directly around $e^{(\text{something})}$, or $e$ wrapped directly around $\ln(\text{something})$, the answer is just that "something".
Worked example 2
Worked example 3
Notice the symmetry: an equation of the form $\ln(\ldots) = \text{number}$ is undone by applying $e$ to both sides; an equation of the form $e^{(\ldots)} = \text{number}$ is undone by applying $\ln$ to both sides. You always apply the opposite operation to strip away the one that's there. This is the whole idea the next lesson extends to harder, multi-step equations.
Worked example 4
Whenever the unknown sits inside the argument of a $\ln$ (rather than being the whole equation), always check that your final answer keeps that argument positive. Here it clearly does — but with more complicated equations later, a solution can come out algebraically correct and still be rejected because it makes the original $\ln$ undefined.
$\ln(x+y) \neq \ln x + \ln y$ — there's no law for the log of a sum, only of a product. And $e^{x+y} = e^x e^y$ (indices add), but $e^{x+y} \neq e^x + e^y$. Keep "what's inside one ln/e" separate from "two lns/e's combined", exactly as with any other base.
Check yourself
Solve $\ln(2x + 1) = 2$, giving your answer to 3 significant figures, and confirm the solution is valid.
(Hint: raise e to both sides first, then check $2x+1 > 0$.)
Raise $e$ to both sides to strip the $\ln$ immediately, solve the resulting linear equation as normal, then always confirm the argument of the original $\ln$ is positive.