Whenever the variable is replaced by a linear expression $ax+b$, the standard result still applies — divide by $a$ and carry on.
8 min read4 worked examples
Stretching a standard result
Differentiating $f(ax+b)$ with the chain rule multiplies the derivative by $a$ — the coefficient of $x$ inside the bracket. Integrating reverses this: replacing $x$ with the linear expression $ax+b$ in a standard result introduces an extra factor of $\dfrac1a$, to compensate.
The rule
If $\displaystyle\int f(x)\,dx = F(x)+c$, then $\displaystyle\int f(ax+b)\,dx = \dfrac1a F(ax+b)+c$.
Applied to the standard results from the previous lesson, this gives a short list of linear-composite versions:
For $\dfrac1{2x-1}$ to be defined throughout $[1,3]$, the denominator $2x-1$ must never equal zero on that interval — here $2x-1$ ranges from 1 to 5, safely positive throughout, so no modulus subtlety arises.
Common mistake
Multiplying by $a$ instead of dividing by it — or forgetting the $\dfrac1a$ factor altogether and integrating as though $ax+b$ were simply $x$. The factor of $\dfrac1a$ is what makes the chain-rule differentiation of the answer come back out correctly; it's easy to check by differentiating.
Check yourself
Find $\displaystyle\int (3x-2)^3\,dx$.
Method
1
Integrating as if x gives $\dfrac{(3x-2)^4}{4}$.
Apply the power rule to the bracket.
2
Here $a=3$, so divide by 3: $\dfrac{(3x-2)^4}{4\times3}=\dfrac{(3x-2)^4}{12}$.
Correct for the coefficient of x inside the bracket.